The existence of health disparities has always fueled my
passion in healthcare. Not everyone has equal access to the healthcare that
they need to survive. That is one thing I would love to help change in the
world because everyone should be able to get the help that they need. That is
one reason why I truly appreciate the public healthcare system in Italy. This
system allows for everyone to go to the doctor, for free or at low cost. Through
the National Health Service all citizens and legal foreign residents are
covered by the public health care sector. In 1998 emergency and essential
services began to be provided for undocumented immigrants too (Donatini, Reed, & Squires, n.d.). The only people not
covered under the public health care system are tourists, though there are
several health clinics in Florence to provide care to foreign
citizens at moderate fees.
The system is funded by the government paid through the
taxes of the residents, voluntary health insurance, corporate and noncorporate
companies, and visits, procedures, and medicines that are not covered by the
public healthcare scope (Donatini et al., n.d.). Public healthcare covers a
lot of services including regular visits with a general practitioner, pharmaceuticals,
inpatient care, preventive medicine, outpatient care, specialist care, home
care, primary care, hospice care, mental care and so much more (Donatini et al., n.d.). Even dental care is covered
for children 16 and younger as well for other at-risk populations and people
who are in emergency or economic need. Things that are not covered include
cosmetic surgery, services covered only on a case-by-case basis (e.g., orthodontics
and laser eye surgery), and services for which hospital admissions are likely
to be inappropriate, such as cataract surgery. These services are provided but
must be funded by the patient themselves, or the region of the hospital can
cover it for them (Donatini et al., n.d.).
The system is not always perfect; sometimes wait times reach
weeks or months, patients do not get to always pick their doctor, doctors could
switch in the middle of care giving, and sometimes they are not always
friendly. In my opinion, the few downfalls do not outweigh the benefits of this
amazing system. If a person is unhappy with the service provided by the public
healthcare system, they are always welcome to pay for quicker service and a
more tailored healthcare experience in the private system. There are always
options, which is another reason Italy’s healthcare system is so outstanding. In
2000, Italy’s healthcare system was ranked second best in the world (behind
France) in a ranking by the World Health Organization (WHO) (World Health Organization, 2000). Also, according to WHO the
average life expectancy of a person born in Italy in 2015 was 82.7 years, while
in the United States, life expectancy was only 79.3 at that time (World Health Organization, 2016). This could be attributed to
some of the healthy lifestyle habits that Italians have, but also to the
exceptional care that is provided by the public healthcare system.
This post was written by Taylor Quarles, a senior in
Developmental and Family Science. She has a concentration in Child Development
and a minor in Biology. She intends to go to medical school after graduating.
Donatini, A., Reed, S. J., & Squires, D. (n.d.). Italy :
International Health Care System Profiles. Retrieved July 12, 2017, from
http://international.commonwealthfund.org/countries/italy/
World Health Organization. (2000, June
21). WHO | World Health Organization Assesses the World’s Health Systems.
Retrieved July 26, 2017, from
http://www.who.int/whr/2000/media_centre/press_release/en/
World Health Organization. (2016, June
6). GHO | By category | Life expectancy - Data by country. Retrieved July 26,
2017, from http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.SDG2016LEXv?lang=en
Another very complex issue that may not be repaired by just following others solution. The states are much larger with larger populations etc. and many do not pay taxes which means the population that pays taxes, say 20% carries the weight of the 80% who don't. Probably not sustainable. The percentages are hypothetical and not real or accurate in any way! Just used them for example. I have some varying thoughts regarding healthcare that may be too political for the scope of your blog. Suffice it to say, I personally object to taxpayers carrying a heavier and heavier tax burden, but clearly our system needs a complete overhaul.
ReplyDelete